Learning science

What the evidence says, and what it doesn't

BrainyGym applies four replicated findings from learning science. Here are the studies, what they measured, and where they stop.

Spaced practice

Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted & Rohrer (2006), Psychological Bulletin

What it measured

A meta-analysis of hundreds of experiments on when to review: memory is more durable when reviews are spread out than when they are crammed, and the best gap grows with how far away the test is.

What it doesn't say

Most studies used lists of words or facts and tests within days or weeks. The benefit for complex skills is real but less precisely mapped.

In BrainyGym

Each review is scheduled right before you would forget it, from how you answered last time, not on a fixed calendar.

Retrieval practice

Roediger & Karpicke (2006), Psychological Science

What it measured

Students who took a test after one reading remembered more a week later than students who reread the text, even though rereading felt more effective to them.

What it doesn't say

University students and prose passages; a single week. The effect is one of the most replicated in the field, but the size varies with the material.

In BrainyGym

Every module asks you to answer before it lets you reread: quiz first, cards second, then explaining it in your own words.

Interleaving

Rohrer & Taylor (2007), Instructional Science

What it measured

Mixing problem types during practice lowered scores during the session but raised them on the test a week later, compared with practising one type at a time.

What it doesn't say

Maths problems with students; the benefit shows when the types are easy to confuse. For unrelated topics it is smaller or absent.

In BrainyGym

The daily session alternates concepts from the same course that are easy to mix up, so you learn to tell which one applies.

The 2013 synthesis

Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan & Willingham (2013), Psychological Science in the Public Interest

What it measured

A review of ten study techniques across hundreds of experiments: practice testing and spaced practice rated high utility; rereading and highlighting rated low; self-explanation moderate.

What it doesn't say

A review, not a new experiment. "Moderate" for self-explanation means promising with less evidence, not proven.

In BrainyGym

The Feynman step, explaining a concept in your own words to Brainy, rests on that moderate rating. We say so rather than oversell it.

What we have not done

BrainyGym has not run its own controlled study. What we measure today is 7-day retention and completed practice inside the product. When a figure has enough learners behind it to mean something, it will be published here together with how it was measured.

Your first course, today.

Create my first course for free

No card · One full course a month, free